Essays, Speeches & Public Letters
Buy on Amazon — Essays, Speeches & Public Letters
Detailed overview
Essays, Speeches & Public Letters gathers William Faulkner's nonfiction across literary reminiscence, regional self-description, civil-rights argument, ceremonial address, book reviewing, and public controversy. The editor's preface says Faulkner once planned a book called The American Dream but completed only "On Privacy" and "On Fear"; the collection therefore becomes a fuller record of mature public prose rather than the tighter volume Faulkner might have assembled. Its editorial logic is archival: typescripts, correspondence, publication history, corrected errors, and preserved idiosyncrasies matter because the book is trying to show Faulkner speaking outside fiction without smoothing him into a single public position.
The essays repeatedly return to the problem of where a writer begins. "A Note on Sherwood Anderson" uses New Orleans, Jackson Square, Horace Liveright, Winesburg, Ohio, The Triumph of the Egg, and the quarrel over Sherwood Anderson & Other Famous Creoles to describe apprenticeship, style, humiliation, and artistic fidelity. "Mississippi" expands the same question into geography and lineage: Memphis, the Gulf of Mexico, Chickasaws, Choctaws, Natchez, Yazoos, Sartorises, De Spains, Compsons, McCaslins, Snopeses, courthouse towns, swamps, prairies, and hunting camps become the raw material from which Faulkner's fictional county is inseparable.
The mid-1950s civil-rights pieces are the most uneasy public documents in the volume. "Letter to a Northern Editor," "On Fear," and "A Letter to the Leaders in the Negro Race" show Faulkner trying to oppose segregation while also distrusting outside compulsion, litigation tempo, and mass politics. He invokes the Supreme Court's 1954 school decision, Autherine Lucy at the University of Alabama, Montgomery bus lines, the NAACP, Gandhi, Booker T. Washington, communism, Africa, and global anticolonial politics. The result is not a simple manifesto but a record of a white Mississippian trying to argue himself and his region toward desegregation through vocabulary that is often paternalist, anxious, and Cold War-inflected.
The speeches show Faulkner translating literary authority into public counsel. The Nobel Prize address in Stockholm turns the atomic age into a warning against fear and insists that writers must return to the "human heart in conflict with itself." The University High School address in Oxford makes the same anti-fear lesson local for graduates; the Delta Council address turns from compliment and self-mockery to a long defense of individual responsibility against relief rolls, bureaucratic dependency, and political manipulation. The Pine Manor speech casts each generation as inheriting an unfinished world, while the Legion of Honor and Athens Academy addresses place Faulkner inside international literary ceremony.
The public letters and reviews widen the record beyond solemn addresses. Faulkner writes on Moby Dick, Franco and Republican Spain, General Lear's discipline of soldiers, the dog Pete killed by a motorcar, Oxford's courthouse preservation, the Attala County child murders, Oxford beer laws, and Hemingway's The Old Man and the Sea. These pieces matter because they show his public prose operating at different scales: literary judgment, local satire, grief, racial shame, civic memory, and quick newspaper combat all sit beside the canonical Nobel address.
Core concepts
- Memory, Narrative, and Knowledge Preservation: the editor reconstructs Faulkner's public voice from typescripts, letters, publication histories, and preserved textual idiosyncrasies.
- Culture, Identity, and Legitimacy: "Mississippi" layers geography, Indigenous displacement, family lineage, courthouse life, race, and fictional names into a contested regional identity.
- Language and Ideology: the civil-rights pieces show Faulkner arguing against segregation through Cold War, gradualist, and paternalist vocabularies that both enable and constrain his public position.
- Coercive Labor: the Caroline Barr sermon frames affection and gratitude inside the racial labor order created by bondage and domestic service.
Source links
Section-by-section notes
Editor's Preface to the First Edition
Summary: The preface explains that Faulkner once imagined a connected nonfiction book called The American Dream, but only "On Privacy" and "On Fear" were written in 1955 and 1956. In the absence of instructions from Faulkner, the editor chooses completeness over selectivity, including mature articles, speeches, book reviews, introductions, and public letters while omitting apprentice student pieces and some fragmentary public letters. The preface also describes the textual method: original typescripts, editor and agent correspondence, publication notes, silent corrections to indentation and punctuation, uniform letter headings, italicized book titles, and preserved Faulknerian spelling or syntax. Source anchors: The American Dream; On Privacy; On Fear; original typescripts; public letters; J.B.M.
Analysis: The American Dream, On Privacy, and On Fear explain why the book is not the authored collection Faulkner might have made; it is a posthumous exercise in Memory, Narrative, and Knowledge Preservation. Original typescripts and public letters let J.B.M. reconstruct Faulkner's public prose, while the decision to preserve idiosyncratic spelling warns the reader that documentary voice should not be normalized into editorial smoothness.
A Note on Sherwood Anderson
Summary: Faulkner remembers Sherwood Anderson in New Orleans, especially a scene in Jackson Square where Anderson turns a supposed dream about leading a horse into a parable of America, labor, purity, and artistic vocation. The essay names Winesburg, Ohio, The Triumph of the Egg, Melville, Twain, Dreiser, Hemingway's The Torrents of Spring, William Spratling, Sherwood Anderson & Other Famous Creoles, and Horace Liveright. It presents Anderson as generous, wounded, afraid of ridicule, devoted to purity of style, and decisive in Faulkner's own start as a novelist when Soldiers' Pay reaches Liveright through Anderson's recommendation without Anderson reading it. Source anchors: Jackson Square; horse; Winesburg, Ohio; The Torrents of Spring; Spratling; Soldiers' Pay; Horace Liveright.
Analysis: Jackson Square and the horse let Faulkner turn memory into a portrait of artistic method, with Anderson inventing as he talks. Winesburg, Ohio and The Torrents of Spring locate the older writer's achievement and vulnerability, while Spratling, Soldiers' Pay, and Horace Liveright show the personal cost and practical benefit of the apprenticeship: Faulkner wounds Anderson's style and still receives the publishing bridge that begins his own career.
Mississippi
Summary: "Mississippi" begins in a Memphis hotel lobby and extends south to the Gulf of Mexico, making the state a north-south geography of courthouse towns, alluvial swamps, black bayous, cane, buckvine, cypress, prairies, pine barrens, live oaks, alligators, and water moccasins. Faulkner layers Indigenous and settler histories by naming mound builders, Algonquian remains, Chickasaws, Choctaws, Natchez, Yazoos, Sartorises, De Spains, Compsons, McCaslins, Ewells, Holstons, Hogganbecks, and Snopeses. The essay folds hunting, rail difficulty, courthouse life, family lineage, race, class, and fictional names into one regional self-account. Source anchors: Memphis; Gulf of Mexico; Chickasaws; Choctaws; Sartorises; Snopeses; courthouse.
Analysis: Memphis and the Gulf of Mexico make the state a corridor before it is a political unit. Chickasaws, Choctaws, Sartorises, and Snopeses turn Culture, Identity, and Legitimacy into a layered regional claim: Faulkner stacks displaced peoples, Civil War families, tenant-class figures, and fictional lineages in the same landscape. The courthouse anchors that claim institutionally by linking travel, law, memory, and the county world behind the fiction.
On Privacy
Summary: In "On Privacy," Faulkner defends the private life of the artist against public curiosity that grew after fame, prizes, interviews, and celebrity journalism. The essay belongs to the planned The American Dream project and sits beside "On Fear" as one of its two completed chapters. Faulkner's concern is not ordinary secrecy but the writer's need for a protected interior life in which work can be done without being converted into publicity, biographical gossip, public consumption, or marketable personality. The piece belongs to the same public moment as the Nobel Prize and later speaking tours, when Faulkner's name had become a public object separate from the work. Source anchors: On Privacy; The American Dream; fame; interviews; private life; writer's work.
Analysis: On Privacy and The American Dream make this essay part of Faulkner's attempt to define American public life after his own celebrity increased. Fame and interviews are not incidental annoyances; they threaten to replace writer's work with personality. Private life therefore becomes a working condition, the space where the author can remain answerable to language rather than to a crowd's appetite for access.
On Fear: Deep South in Labor: Mississippi
Summary: "On Fear" connects Mississippi's segregation crisis to a global Cold War struggle over freedom, equality, communism, colonialism, and race. Faulkner argues that the South's refusal to practice freedom at home weakens America's ability to persuade nonwhite peoples abroad, while also insisting that freedom cannot be built as a hierarchy of caste-like degrees. He refers to the 1954 Supreme Court ruling on segregation, Africa, communism, white Western power, Booker Washington, Carver, Robeson, Fuchs, Rosenberg, Gold, Burgess, McLean, and Hiss. The piece combines anticommunist rhetoric with a warning that white supremacy may isolate the remaining white world against the nonwhite majority of the earth. Source anchors: Supreme Court ruling; 1954; Africa; communism; Booker Washington; Carver; Robeson.
Analysis: The Supreme Court ruling and 1954 place the essay inside the immediate aftermath of school desegregation, while Africa and communism make Mississippi a global liability in Faulkner's Cold War reasoning. Booker Washington, Carver, and Robeson show Language and Ideology doing political work: Faulkner argues that white Americans discredit freedom by denying it at home, but he frames Black achievement and loyalty through a paternalist anticommunist vocabulary that narrows the argument he can make.
A Letter to the Leaders in the Negro Race
Summary: This letter responds to controversy over Faulkner's reported statement about choosing Mississippi over the United States and clarifies his "go slow" position after Autherine Lucy's exclusion from the University of Alabama. He addresses the NAACP and other organizations, arguing for flexibility in method but not in the demand for equality, and invokes Gandhi, the Montgomery bus boycott, Booker T. Washington, public schools, legal pressure, courtesy, dignity, patience, and repeated nonviolent attempts at admission. The letter is written in hypothetical first person as if Faulkner were advising Black leaders, and it insists that violence and unreason should not originate from those seeking equal rights. Source anchors: Autherine Lucy; University of Alabama; NAACP; Gandhi; Montgomery; Booker T. Washington; patience.
Analysis: Autherine Lucy and the University of Alabama give the letter its immediate tactical problem: how to press a legal victory without producing lethal backlash. NAACP, Gandhi, and Montgomery identify the methods Faulkner is trying to combine, while Booker T. Washington and patience expose Language and Ideology at its limit: the letter praises nonviolent discipline but also asks Black political leaders to absorb risks and delays created by white resistance.
Albert Camus
Summary: Faulkner's tribute to Albert Camus turns Camus's death into a meditation on absurdity, revolt, life, sunlight, God, artistic searching, and the closed door of death. He recalls Camus's belief that man in an absurd world must live, remain aware, and refuse the track leading only to death; he also quotes Camus on death as a shutting door. Faulkner mentions Camus's Nobel laureateship, his own French telegram, the tree struck in the fatal crash, and the artist's need to leave behind the record "I was here." Source anchors: Albert Camus; absurd world; sunlight; Nobel laureate; tree; I was here.
Analysis: Albert Camus and absurd world let Faulkner speak about a writer whose philosophical vocabulary differs from his own but whose artistic labor he recognizes. Sunlight and tree oppose the life-seeking track to the sudden fact of the crash, while Nobel laureate and I was here make the tribute less about unfinished quantity than about whether Camus had already made a durable mark.
Funeral Sermon for Mammy Caroline Barr
Summary: Faulkner's funeral sermon for Caroline Barr was delivered at Oxford, Mississippi, on February 4, 1940, after her death on January 31, and later revised from the Memphis Commercial Appeal version. He describes her as someone who had known him all his life, a source of authority, security, affection, truth-telling, thrift, consideration for the weak, and respect for age. The sermon states that she was born in bondage, lived through a dark time in the South, served a family not her own for wages that never amounted to worldly goods, and earned gratitude, grief, and affection. Source anchors: Caroline Barr; Oxford; February 4, 1940; bondage; authority; Memphis Commercial Appeal.
Analysis: Caroline Barr and bondage make Coercive Labor inseparable from the sermon, even as Faulkner frames her domestic service through family love and personal indebtedness. Oxford and February 4, 1940 keep the speech local and ceremonial, while the Memphis Commercial Appeal shows how a private funeral utterance entered the public record and became part of Faulkner's nonfiction archive.
Address upon Receiving the Nobel Prize for Literature
Summary: The Nobel address was given in Stockholm on December 10, 1950, and frames the prize as recognition of the work rather than the man. Faulkner speaks to young writers under the shadow of atomic fear, arguing that the central literary material is the human heart in conflict with itself rather than the question of when humanity will be blown up. He names love, honor, pity, pride, compassion, and sacrifice as the old truths, rejects the end of man, and says the poet's voice can help humanity endure and prevail. Source anchors: Stockholm; December 10, 1950; atomic fear; human heart; compassion; endure and prevail.
Analysis: Stockholm and December 10, 1950 place Faulkner at the peak of international recognition, but atomic fear makes the speech less triumphant than admonitory. Human heart and compassion define his standard for fiction, while endure and prevail converts literary work into a support for human courage rather than a record of despair. The prize money and acclaim are deliberately subordinated to the young writer who may someday stand in the same hall, so the speech turns honor into succession.
Address to the Graduating Class, University High School
Summary: Speaking in Oxford, Mississippi, on May 28, 1951, Faulkner tells graduates that youth has power without knowledge and age has knowledge without force. He says the real danger is not the atom bomb itself but fear used by tyrants, politicians, ideologies, communist, socialist, or democratic systems to reduce individuals into an obedient mass. He urges the students, as individuals rather than as a class, to raise their voices for honesty, truth, compassion, and against injustice, lying, and greed, naming Napoleon, Hitler, Caesar, Mussolini, and Stalin among the figures who exploit fear and greed. Source anchors: Oxford; May 28, 1951; atom bomb; fear; individuals; Hitler; Stalin.
Analysis: Oxford and May 28, 1951 make the Nobel address's anti-fear message local for school graduates. Atom bomb and fear give the speech its Cold War pressure, while individuals, Hitler, and Stalin show why Faulkner's answer is not a program but a demand that each student refuse mass obedience. The school setting matters because he assigns world-changing power to young men and women before they have settled into the caution he associates with age.
Address to the Delta Council
Summary: The Delta Council speech, delivered in Cleveland, Mississippi, on May 15, 1952, begins with Billy Wynn's compliment and Faulkner's jokes about not knowing writing or farming, then becomes a long speech on responsibility. Faulkner rereads life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as work, dignity, independence, self-respect, and the duty to be responsible for one's own freedom. He attacks relief rolls, bureaucratic and political gravy-troughs, debased currency, mink coats, oil tankers, corruption, and a rights-only public vocabulary, invoking John Curran, Boone, Franklin, Booker T. Washington, Lincoln, Jefferson, John Henry, Paul Bunyan, Johnny Appleseed, Lee, Crockett, Hale, and Helen Keller. Source anchors: Delta Council; Billy Wynn; responsibility; pursuit of happiness; relief roll; John Curran; Helen Keller.
Analysis: Delta Council and Billy Wynn place Faulkner before a Mississippi civic audience that expected local honor, not merely literary remarks. Responsibility and pursuit of happiness let him redefine freedom as duty and earned independence, while relief roll, John Curran, and Helen Keller furnish the contrast between inherited vigilance and what he sees as modern dependency or public corruption.
Public Letters and Reviews
Summary: The letters and reviews show Faulkner working in short public forms: he names Moby Dick as the book he most wishes he had written, opposes Franco and fascism in Republican Spain, satirizes the outcry over General Lear disciplining soldiers who shouted "yoo-hoo," mourns Pete the fifteen-month-old pointer killed by a motorcar, defends the Oxford courthouse, condemns the light punishment after the Attala County murders of three Black children, argues over Oxford beer claims, and praises Hemingway's The Old Man and the Sea. These pieces move through the Chicago Tribune, League of American Writers, Memphis Commercial Appeal, Oxford Eagle, and Shenandoah. Source anchors: Moby Dick; Franco; General Lear; Pete; Oxford courthouse; Attala County; Old Man and the Sea.
Analysis: Moby Dick and The Old Man and the Sea reveal Faulkner's compressed literary standards, especially his admiration for Melville's tragic scale and Hemingway's late discovery of pity. Franco, General Lear, Pete, Oxford courthouse, and Attala County show the same prose voice entering political, military, civic, animal, and racial controversies. The courthouse letter returns to Memory, Narrative, and Knowledge Preservation at civic scale: Faulkner treats the building as a material carrier of Oxford's public past rather than disposable real estate.